Over the years, we’ve collected tips on creating a winning entry from those that know – past winners and judges. Here’s what a few had to say.
Harry Bosk, APR, Harry Bosk PR & Photography
Make sure when you say that you want to increase awareness that you state with whom, why and by what measurement. Otherwise, it’s not a measurable objective.
Lisa Miles, APR
Media relations is not a measurable objective. It’s a tactic used to reach your target audience. Start asking yourself the question of “why” each time you write an objective and if you can get to something measurable and timely, THEN you have an objective. Also make sure your objectives match up with the rest of the program, particularly the results. I heard a great quote from another judge when we were at the Silver Anvil judging this year – it’s the Alpha and Omega that we look at first – the beginning and end.
Chuck Fitzgibbon, APR, Weber Shandwick
Judges value outcomes more than output. Behavioral change is seen as more valuable than volume of messaging, impressions, material distribution, etc. Smaller, local programs that moved the needle and affected real change often receive higher scores than massive national programs that had a lot of output, but didn’t demonstrate real change.
Organization is key. If your entry isn’t organized as specified in the guidelines, judges may overlook critical information in your entry, or may assume that either you’re not paying attention, or just resubmitting an entry from another competition.
Jody Aud, APR, MedImmune
Make sure what you are entering is really a “campaign.” So often I see entries that are really a single tactic – such as the launch of a newsletter or an Intranet and the entry focuses on just the tactic and why it was selected, audience reach and so on. For me, an entry that’s primary importance on the research, planning and evaluation, and secondary importance on the tactics, is usually one that will stand out from the rest.
Peter Stanton, APR, Stanton Communications
Keep in mind that the awards are as much about what you did that’s new and innovative as what you did well. While the judges may be impressed that you scored a major hit in the national media, it’s far more interesting to know how you did that. Did your overall program incorporate some new approach or some new tactic that galvanized media attention? Was there something in your program that could be instructive for the rest of the profession? If so, flag it.
Judges may be called upon to review dozens of entries. If you are hoping they discern the key element of your creativity, they may miss it. If you are hoping they will be awed by very traditional tactics and outcomes, you may be disappointed. Demonstrate innovation and prove that it accomplished your goals and not just achieved a nice news piece. That’s the way to win.
Paul Eagle, APR
- Winning entries go far above and beyond typical campaigns …
- Results must match objectives
- Campaigns are too focused on media placements – especially “integrated campaigns”
- Pay close attention to the categories you enter – I judged three last week that were simply in the wrong category
- Backup is critical – if you say you wrote a plan, include it…or at least parts of it so we know it exists
- Research is more than “we conducted an informal poll at our agency”
And of course, if you still have questions, don’t hesitate to contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org or call our chapter office at 301-725-2508 and ask away.